Quality assurance systems

 


Quality is a key consideration for perishable fruits such as passion fruit in Rwanda. Photo: Steven Franzel

Overview

Globalization, consumer demand, and public and environmental health concerns increasingly drive vertical integration and standards as supply chain governance tools. Such public and private standards are rules which producers and other actors along the value chain need to comply with in order to gain access to markets.

On one hand, such quality assurance schemes are aimed at contributing to human and environmental friendly production and resource management systems, and thus can be seen as a tool for modernizing such systems. On the other hand, if compliance requirements are complex, such standards can become barriers to trade with negative implications for smallholder access to markets.

In some instances, sustainability standards, also called ‘ecocertification' offer the means for consumers to pay for sustainable production and biodiversity conservation, and in some cases producers receive price premiums for these services.

Research questions

Our research focuses on the overall question: How and under what circumstances can quality assurance systems help the poor and contribute to environmental services? Specifically we are looking at:

  • What are the lessons from established quality assurance systems for sustainability standards and payments for environmental services projects?
  • How can quality assurance systems best be implemented and how can the poor gain better access to certified markets?

Through these questions, we are assessing efficiency and equity impacts of such standards.

Key partners

Funding

Locations

Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Indonesia

Publications

1. Meta-analysis of assessments of organic agriculture's contribution to increased yields, food security and incomes. Also presents a decision support tool for assessing the potential contribution of organic agriculture to improved livelihoods.

Bennett M and Franzel S 2009. Can organic and resource-conserving agriculture improve livelihoods? A meta-analysis and conceptual framework for site-specific evaluation. ICRAF Occasional Paper No. 11. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre.

2. Investigating the potential for eco-certification to improve livelihoods and conserve biodiversity in tropical countries, using the example of a traditional rubber agroforestry practice in Indonesia.

Bennett M 2008. Eco-Certification: Can It Deliver Conservation and Development in the Tropics? Working Paper no 65. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre.

Contacts

Dagmar Mithöefer
Marketing Specialist
Email: d.mithoefer@cgiar.org